During production, it was decided to remove the segment depicting the plaintiff’s fall and injuries. This was done to ensure the entire video sequence was admissible as evidence, as the client’s expert was not capable of opining on the plaintiff’s biomechanics or injury causation.
The final animation focuses on guiding the audience through the incident, depicting the exploding tire failure and subsequent striking of the plaintiff. Due to the speed at which the event occurred, nearly a second, a slowed down depiction of the incident was included with the full speed animation.